![]() ![]() The chain says all of its food is prepared on the premises of each location and sourced from local or sustainable ingredients. Once they’ve pointed to selections housed in colorful cast iron Le Creuset cookware, the kitchen puts each plate together and hands it to diners as they proceed down the line. The company declined to disclose addresses until the leases are fully executed.Įach Urban Plates location asks guests to choose from salads, sandwiches, soups or stews, large plates, and pastries and cakes. ![]() ![]() Another store arrived in Columbia, Maryland, soon after.Įater has learned two other shops are coming to Gaithersburg and Chevy Chase in the fourth quarter of the year. That will mark the third area location for Urban Plates since landing in Tysons Corner Galleria last summer. The first new shop is scheduled to open at Westfield Montgomery Mall in Bethesda on Monday, March 11. Before this unjustifiable action gets even worse, Gujarat’s senior-most BJP leaders must help in restoring status quo ante.California chain Urban Plates is ramping up its East Coast expansion plans, planning to open three Maryland locations for its fast-casual cafeteria counters before the end of the year. Taking some food vendors from their corners and pushing them into smaller roads has a direct impact on their livelihoods. GoI’s June 2020 employment data showed that 37.8% of urban households in the state are self-employed, as compared to the national average of 30.7%. Gujarat has a relatively high share of such employment. Food vendors are a subset of the self-employed workforce, a vulnerable group that was badly hit by Covid’s economic fallout. There is also, most immediately, the issue of inequity. These are dangerous trends, with real potential consequences for harmonious coexistence. In some urban centres of states like Haryana, local actions have enforced a ban on meat shops during festivals despite there being no state-level directions on the issue. Note that Gujarat state BJP chief also made similar comments. The move also raises questions about the CM’s assurance. ![]() This salad bowl of unconvincing justifications suggests civic authorities have manufactured reasons to push some vendors into less-visible parts of the city. Civic officials are now claiming encroachment as a reason. Notwithstanding that, on Tuesday, about 40,000-50,000 vendors of the city’s 1.1 lakh were estimated by their association to have stayed away. But Gujarat CM Bhupendra Patel clarified that state policy did not intrude on food choices as long as relevant guidelines are followed. Ahmedabad’s civic agency officials attributed the drive to complaints from some residents. The committee’s chairman said food carts targeted will be ones on arterial roads and those near schools or religious places. Ahmedabad civic body’s town planning committee announced a drive against non-vegetarian street food vendors. The sequence of events, as made clear by TOI reports, is also troubling. And as for hygiene, officials surely should have their plates full – why not clean up hospitals, for example. It is deeply concerning that we are adding olfactory intolerance to the increasingly long list of intolerances in India. These include comments by officials on “smell” and “hygiene”. Four of the state’s urban civic bodies, including that in Ahmedabad, have targeted vendors selling non-vegetarian food on utterly unreasonable and absurd grounds. Clearly, some civic officials in Gujarat have read GoI’s strong emphasis on street vending wrong. Acknowledging it, GoI in June 2020 designed a customised microcredit scheme to help them with working capital. Street food vendors are an essential part of the urban landscape. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |